[Return to Alabama Supreme Court Cases, 1820-1826]Genealogical Gleanings FromReports of Cases Determined in theSupreme Court of Alabama, 1820-1826JUDGE CRENSHAWIn this case there are eight assignments of errors, most of which have been overruled by former decisions of this court, and all of which, we think, should be overruled, except the last, which is that the judgment is against the plaintiff in error in her own right, when it should have been against her as administratrix, to be satisfied out of the goods and chattels of her intestate. For this error the judgment must be reversed, and the judgment rendered here, “to be levied of the goods and chattels of her intestate in her hands to be administered.” The court are unanimous in this opinion. Source: Henry Minor, Reporter, Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama From May, 1820, to July, 1826 (Atlanta: 1891), p. 170. |
GenealogyMagazine.com - Copyright © 2000-2010 Datatrace Systems |