What is an Inquisition post mortem?
By William R. Gann
Adapted from The Gann Gazette, Vol. 5, No. 4. Reprinted with permission of the author.
A man named John Gann died on 22 January 1526/27, in the county of
Lincolnshire, England. After his death, an inquisition post mortem taken.
An inquisition post mortem is not the same as a coroner’s inquest, or the medical
post mortem carried out after a suspicious death. In reality, a post mortem
(Latin term meaning “after death”) is a local inquiry into the lands (real estate) held by
people of some status or social or financial standing. The purpose was to discover what
income and legal rights were due to the Crown (the King). In other words, what property
was held by the deceased, which might belong to the King. Remember, this was before
modern times!
Inquisitions were held only when it was thought or known that the deceased held lands
which belonged to the Crown. These records of post mortems are of value to the
family researcher since the evidence presented in the inquiry gives the name of the
property or holdings of the deceased. Next, the name and age of an heir are given, if there
were one. Since this was in effect, the eldest male was in line to automatically receive all
property of the father. If the heir was male, then he received all of the lands. If the heirs
were daughters, then the land was divided among them regardless of their ages. When the
heirs were under age, the King took possession of the lands until the heir(s) came of age.
Sometimes a proof of age was recorded in a separate inquiry of inquisition. Widows also
had rights of dower in the lands, which continued long after the death of their husbands,
and there are inquisitions into this as well. These different actions are usually recorded as
part of the inquisition post mortem.
After the death of John Gann, an inquisition was taken at Sleford in the county of
Lincolnshire ”of the fifth day of the month of November in the eighteenth year of the
reign of King Henry VIII” [1516-1517]. Robert Hussey, esquire, Escheator
of the King, served as judge of the inquiry. From testimony of several witnesses, they
named a certain Thomas Gann, chaplain, and others who were “seized of”
(possessed) one messuage (dwelling house) and twelve and one-half acres of arable land in
the town and fields of Stowe, a few miles northwest of the modern day city of Lincoln.
And in addition, they also held one messuage and fifteen acres of arable land and meadow
in Stowe and Barham (Barholme) in the county of Lincolnshire for the use of the aforesaid
John Gann, his heirs and assigns.
When John Gadd died, he personally was seized of four messuages in Brune in the county
of Lincolnshire. The witnesses further stated that John Gann neither had nor held any
additional land. The inquisition further stated that John Gann had a son, William Gann,
who was his next heir and was of the age of 21 and more.
____________
William R. Gann, a retired educator, served as editor of the Missouri State
Genealogical Association’s Newsletter and Journal. He and Gary R. Toms
co-authored a narrative history, The Ignatious Nathan Gann Family: Three Generations of
Pioneers.
***
|